Credit: John Sainsbury
Research
Our research demonstrates the positive impact on young people of working with art, artists and galleries.
We address the value of visual art in targeting specific needs in underserved communities, and the vital ingredients for supporting young people to build their personal, social and creative wellbeing.
Key findings
The Fund has been developed in response to issues with teenage loneliness, isolation, anxiety and pressure. Our emerging research is already indicating the strength of the projects in building the young people’s confidence and agency, and in significantly expanding their connections and creative horizons.
We have seen an increase in personal growth; development of social skills, creative skills, and an improvement in overall wellbeing.
We examine the journeys of young participants, but also the impact on art institutions, education and community settings, and artists.
Framework
Our research focus
What are the vital ingredients within the Mildred Fund programme that can support young people in developing social, personal and creative wellbeing?
To build our collective knowledge, we also enable the funded organisations to co-develop a research focus that is relevant to their specific context.
We have three research questions shown below.
You can see our findings in relation to these questions within our Key Research Findings, our Annual Research Report, and our Case Studies.
What is the development journey for young people who participate in focused art provision?
What is the development journey for young people who participate in focused art provision?
What is the development journey for young people who participate in focused art provision?
Increased confidence: Participants experienced growth in personal, social, and creative confidence. This included greater self-esteem, improved social skills, and enhanced creative expression.
Personal growth: Young people developed resilience, self-assurance, and a sense of agency, becoming more comfortable in their own stories and identities.
Social skills: The programmes fostered a sense of belonging and acceptance, enhancing participants' ability to work collaboratively and communicate effectively with others.
Creative skills: Participants gained confidence in using materials and equipment, experimenting with ideas, and taking creative risks. They developed a sense of ownership and pride in their artwork.
Wellbeing: The programmes supported overall wellbeing by providing a safe and inclusive space for personal and creative exploration, leading to meaningful personal growth. This led to improved academic performance for some participants.
What learning do cultural institutions gain through working long-term with/alongside young people?
What learning do cultural institutions gain through working long-term with/alongside young people?
What learning do cultural institutions gain through working long-term with/alongside young people?
Organisational change: Through developing long-term programmes that seek to positively impact young people's wellbeing and confidence, engagement beyond the learning teams into the wider gallery operations resulted in small but significant changes in organisational behaviour and processes.
Strengthened community ties: Collaborating with schools and community groups helps galleries build stronger relationships within their local communities, supporting young people at a time of critical need.
Innovative practices: Engaging in process-led and inclusive arts programmes allows galleries to explore and innovate their practices, leading to new methodologies and approaches that are found to have benefit for young people and the other organisations involved.
Professional development: Staff and artists involved in these programmes gain valuable experience, knowledge and skills in working with diverse groups, enhancing their professional development and capacity to deliver impactful programmes.
What do those working with young people in schools and communities learn about the value of the arts?
What do those working with young people in schools and communities learn about the value of the arts?
What learning do cultural institutions gain through working long-term with/alongside young people?
Shifting perceptions and understanding: Organisations noticed shifts in teachers’ perception of the possibilities of different artistic practices, and awareness of new artforms was increased. Teachers realised it was OK for them – as a teacher – not to always ‘get’ art straight away, and that it is OK if there is noise and bustle in a lesson (a shift in what a successful lesson looks like, which was often based on how well behaviour is managed). Teachers also realised it was beneficial to step away from the curriculum and outside of the classroom, and that they could appreciate appreciating process over outcome more.
Confidence in using the gallery as a resource: Teachers became confident about what the gallery could offer, seeing it as a valuable resource; they committed to bringing students back after the project had ended, and became confident in integrating the gallery into their curriculum.
Deeper relationships were built between teachers and their students: Galleries noticed that teachers were able to listen more/better; were able to observe their students in a different light through being outside the classroom; and that there were shifts in their perception of the capabilities of their students.
Wider reach for the arts in school: Galleries were told that the projects advocated for the arts as a subject, and that the kudos provided by the gallery partnership was valuable for the subject’s status in school. Bringing the displays to the schools – in the case of Tate St Ives and Camden Art Centre – further advocated for the arts.
“What surprised me was how much the group wanted to be heard. Once they felt safe, the conversations were deep and really insightful.”
Artist
The Mildred Fund Case Studies
Here we share selected case studies drawn from our funded projects.
The programme research is building summary narratives which present the value of the visual arts in specific areas of need, and the vital ingredients for supporting young people to build their personal, social and creative futures.
Methodology
Our programme research has been developed through interviews and reflection sessions with project teams and facilitators, as well as a range of enquiry research methods undertaken by individual organisations. These include observations; discussion and conversation; surveys and interviews; group reflections; learning journals; and creative responses to key questions.
Why we are prioritising programme-based research
We believe that a programme-level research approach is enabling us to learn about the work in greater depth.
Underpinned by a literature review, the programme research has drawn out learning and created new knowledge that will contribute to the growing discourse across the creative and cultural and health sectors about the value of the arts for mental health and wellbeing.
We also enable the funded organisations to co-develop a research focus that is relevant to their specific context, in order to collectively build knowledge.
Research team
The research is overseen by Anna Cutler, former Tate Director of Learning, and delivered by Research Lead, Sarah B. Davies.
Annual Research Report
At the end of each year we present a research report summarising the year of research activity across all the funded galleries, exploring the processes of the programmes and their benefits and impact.
The 2024/5 report includes insights from youth programmes with schools and communities created at Camden Art Centre, Kettle’s Yard, Leeds Art Gallery, South London Gallery, Tate St Ives, Turner Contemporary and Whitworth Art Gallery.
It highlights the significance of inclusion and attentiveness and also reveals that wellbeing is both an individual and collective outcome.